Stern calls for action

In November 2006, when Nicholas Stern issued a report on the economics of climate change, the “sternness” of his predictions would not have escaped anyone. This was not a report by a climatologist, but an economist. Calling climate change the “greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen,” Mr Stern laid out the possible scenarios if global temperatures continued to rise.If no action is taken on emissions, the Stern report predicts a 75% possibility of global temperatures rising by two to three degrees. There is a 50% chance that average global temperatures could rise by 50C. Such changes would drastically alter the geography of the world.

The last Ice Age ended some 10,000 years ago. Today, the world today is about 50C warmer than the last Ice Age. This means that it took thousands of years for a rise in 50C. Yet, just in the last 100 years, temperatures have gone up by nearly a degree. And the Stern Report is talking about a probable rise in 2-30C in just the next 50 years.

The impact of climate change on the world’s water resources would be staggering. Melting glaciers will increase flood risks and then severely reduce water supplies. Declining crop yields will bring in food scarcity. There will be more instances of extreme weather events such as storms, droughts, forest fires, flooding and heat waves. In fact, it is expected that weather patterns such as El Nino and monsoons would shift.

Extreme weather events are already being witnessed more often nowadays. Hurricanes and typhoons are wreaking more destruction than before. This very month, Australia experienced freakish wintry conditions just weeks before the start of its summer. Bushfires, hail, snow, thunderstorms and chilly wind broke out in different part of Australia all within a short span of time, throwing life out of gear. In fact, the country’s biggest insurance company has made grim predictions about climate change.

Rising sea levels could cause some two million people to be permanently displaced by the middle of the century. Some of the cities threatened by sea level rises include London, Shanghai, New York, Tokyo and Hong Kong.

The water and wastewater treatment industry will have to brace itself for hard times ahead. Drying rivers and desertification combined with pollution will drive up the cost of water treatment. Extreme precipitation can cause serious sewer overflows and destruction of infrastructure, which need to be planned for. Encroaching seas can contaminate fresh water supplies. Desalination and wastewater reuse might become the norm rather than the exception. The treatment industry also needs to become more energy-efficient and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

According to the report, bringing down the level of emissions worldwide will have a cost. “Costs will be incurred as the world shifts from a high-carbon to a low-carbon trajectory. But there will also be business opportunities as the markets for low carbon, high-efficiency good and services expand.” Many low-carbon technologies are more expensive than fossil-fuel alternatives, but costs of technologies do tend to fall over time.

Collective action is urgently needed from governments, businesses and citizens around the world to halt the march of climate change. It is still possible to avoid the worst impacts by acting collectively now.

3 thoughts on “Stern calls for action

  1. How is it that mankind could be so complacent and decision makers so cool towards this forthcoming tragedy?. Are they eagerly awaiting and looking forward for this calamity to happen in their life time?.

  2. What is Singapore’s contribution to global warming? What is its per capita carbon emission? Has it signed the Kyoto protocol? What is the embodied energy per kilo-litre of water in Singapore? Is there a plan to reduce it?
    Interesting now as to how those who have benefitted from negative externalities will address their problems.
    Hopefully we will learn lessons in managing global warming from countries like Singapore too.

    • Singapore has acceded to the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. Now, under the protocol, countries listed under Annex 1 are required to reduce the emission of 6 greenhouse gases by 5.2% below 1990 levels. But Singapore is a non-Annex 1 country and needs to have no emission reduction targets. However, under the Kyoto Protocol, non-Annex 1 countries such as Singapore can participate in Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects and earn tradeable carbon credits issued by the UNFCCC. The National Environment Agency (NEA) is the authority for approving and registering CDM projects in Singapore.

      As you would know, developed countries can buy carbon credits to help meet their emission reduction targets. So carbon trading markets have developed and Singapore is becoming a hub of carbon trading.

      Singapore’s strategy is to actively encourage energy-efficiency so that it can reduce carbon emission intensity (which is the amount of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions per unit of GDP). If you visit the NEA website you will see all the creative ways in which Singapore is trying to achieve energy efficiency. There is the 10% energy reduction challenge, the energy smart building label, the Greenmark scheme and so on – all of which are being taken pretty seriously by the govt and citizens. The NEA has announced a S$22 million grant to assist industries to adopt energy efficient technologies. Then it has launched a S$500,000 grant for CDM projects. Solar energy capability is being built up.

      I don’t have Singapore’s figure for embedded energy per unit of water. When I asked Mr Khoo, PUB’s Chief Executive about this, he said the figures were being worked out. He said a major 2-year study had been commissioned to look into how global warming and climate change would impact Singapore. The results would be made available this year.

      Personally, I think Singapore’s biggest achievements have been in the field of water management both in supply and demand sides – conserving water, reusing/recyling water and in right pricing of water. It has one of the lowest water losses (from networks) in the world. So Singapore has a lot to teach the world when it comes to water management. However, with regard to energy management, Singapore has only just started the process and needs to learn and adapt.

Leave a Reply to G.V.Seshagiri Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s