One river – many custodians

At Vienna, where the World Water Congress was held last month, I finally got the chance to see the most “international river basin” in the world – The Danube River Basin shared by 19 countries.

After emerging from the Black Forest in Germany, the river physically flows through ten countries – Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine before emptying into the Black Sea.

The Danube is the second longest river in Europe (running for 2850km) and is literally the common thread of water binding together the region’s diverse landscape, people and history.

Despite its highly international route, the Danube is held as one of the finest examples of trans-boundary cooperation between so many nations in the interest of sustainable development. The International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) has been doing remarkable work in collaboratively approaching all the issues related to the river and its management. Not all the countries of the Danube River Basin are members of the European Union (EU), yet all have agreed to cooperate to meet the strict EU water protection directives.

Last year, the ICPDR won the A$300,000 Thiess Riverprize, which was awarded at a gala in Australia. “The ICPDR project has aimed to combat the terrible environmental problems in the Danube River including toxic waste pollution and destructive farming practices brought about by the 45-year long Soviet era,” said ICPDR Executive Secretary Philip Weller, during the awards ceremony. “Our overarching goal is to witness the rational use of water within the Danube Basin and minimise negative consequences of the Danube on the Black Sea,” he said.

Getting the cooperation of riparian countries or even states within one country, for managing a river basin is not an easy task. In fact, rivers are often seen as subjects of conflict, especially in South Asia where the neighbours largely distrust each other. Bangladesh has been projecting itself as a downstream victim at every international forum. During the recent floods in the Kosi River, both Nepal and India blamed each other. Meanwhile, India and Bangladesh are also worried that China might build a dam across the Tsangpo River which would curtail flows downstream.

Yet, there are positive examples in the Asian context. Some of the Southeast Asian nations through which the Mekong River passes have cooperated to a great degree in managing the river. Bhutan and India also offer a shining example of cooperation for mutual benefit.

However, Asian countries are still a long way off from coming together with the enlightened vision that a river is a precious resource and that all the countries through which it passes are but its custodians. Despite all the traditions around rivers in Asian countries, the reality is that these are treated as easy means of disposal of waste. Sadly, it is the western world which is having to nudge Asian countries to form coalitions to protect their rivers.

“As we move into a world of increasing complexity and uncertainty around water security I am convinced those who develop and refine the knowledge and approaches for protecting, restoring and sustainably managing river systems, will become our water heroes,” said International Riversymposium Chair Professor Paul Greenfield while recognising the efforts in the Danube.

3 thoughts on “One river – many custodians

  1. The author has no doubt elaborated the problem of rivers flowing alongside many countries & getting polluted but still maintaining its character.

    In this context, it is better to remember that the river is abused more than used in India. While river Ganga has a mythological origin and is highly revered- the river is possibly highly polluted as it flows downstream.

    If only patriotism can percolate to common people beyond national flags to use of river……..Indian rivers may flow with more pride……

    Can the author suggest some practical solution to arrest this trend in India?.

  2. Where there is a will there is a way. If the Indian government gets strict with the implementation of its pollution laws and simultaneously there is a programme to educate the masses about the ills of river pollution, a good beginning can be made. The World Water Monitoring Day is an excellent initiative to promote awareness within the civil society. I have written an article on this before.

    Even in the Indian context there are organisations like Tarun Bharat Sangh led by the charismatic Rajendra Singh who have shown how to clean up a river and worship it in the true sense. He has highlighted how the Kumbh could be used to actually emphasize the need to keep rivers free of muck.

  3. Wow! As much as i appreciate all the organizations working for a better India and all that, there seems to be no improvement. I would like mention the fact from your quote in the first sentence of your reply that there isn’t a way as there isn’t a will. No one not even the authorities care for it. It isn’t like they don’t know about it either and anyway what do i know about? I’m just a 15 year old bookworm!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s